computer shopper
Computer Shopper > Reviews > Miscellaneous Editorial Content


Search:
Go!


Alpha Blog: CNET's gadget & tech news and opinions blogged by our editors
January 12, 2007, 12:05 PM PST
Will Outlook 2007 break your e-mail?
Posted by: Elsa Wenzel

Same message, different Outlook
Same message, different Outlook (Credit: Campaign Monitor)
[+] Enlarge photo

Some digital publishers are complaining that the new Microsoft Outlook rolls back design standards by half a decade. The 2007 edition of Outlook, the most popular e-mail client for big businesses, ditches Internet Explorer's technology for that of Word 2007 to display HTML messages.

The result? In your Outlook 2007 in-box, background images may not appear within dressed-up HTML messages. Forget about filling out certain forms. Animated GIF images won't play, and a red X will mark the spot where a Flash movie would be. ALT tags, which describe pictures and help blind people to "see" them, won't work either. And there's more.

I hadn't noticed funky-looking messages during my beta tests of Outlook 2007, probably because I shun HTML newsletters in favor of plain old text. But if you like to get news and views from various sources via e-mail, those messages might look lopsided and incomplete in Outlook 2007.

Microsoft has improved HTML support within Word 2007, which even offers a blog-editing interface. HTML files within earlier versions of Word were a nightmare of sloppy code. Web content created in Word 2007 looks more elegant on the surface. But when I used Word 2007's blogging layout to create a document containing no more than a photograph and a three-word headline, the resulting HTML file contained a whopping 32,417 characters of code, about the length of a 2,000-word essay. By hand-coding in basic HTML, I cobbled together a nearly identical Web page with a mere 200 characters.

Why would Microsoft rely upon its word processor's technology rather than its nearly ubiquitous Web browser to display e-mail messages? Ostensibly, it's for the sake of security. Microsoft touts Internet Explorer 7 as its safest browser yet. So why aren't IE7's standards strong enough for your in-box?

(via Sitepoint Tech Times)


TalkBack
5 messages

Thanks a lot

I love it when I help you correct your mistake and you don't mention it so it looks like it was mine.

http://reviews.cnet.com/5530-10921_7-0-10.html?forumID=110&messageID=2081358&threadID=192527
by blueboy_32 (See profile) - April 4, 2007 6:37 PM PDT

Will Microsoft ever please anyone?

"Microsoft touts Internet Explorer 7 as its safest browser yet. So why aren't IE7's standards strong enough for your in-box?"

Nobody's saying IE7's standards aren't strong enough for our in-box, Word's standards are simply stronger than IE7's and, given viewing HTML correctly is not as critical in an e-mail client as in a browser, they decided to choose security over looks, and that in no way has anything to do or goes against IE7 being its safest browser yet.
It's sad that a so-called "professional editor" doesn't understand something so simple like this.
by Fil0403 (See profile) - January 21, 2007 3:55 AM PST
0 out of 5 users found this comment helpful

Yikes! Not Microsoft in reverse!

Who would think Microsoft would be so sloppy as to go backwards with technology. I guess they need a few proof readers so to speak.

Thanks for the warning about 2007 MS Office.
by skyace (See profile) - January 18, 2007 6:36 AM PST
5 out of 5 users found this comment helpful | 1 comment

(NT) Microsoft program updates

by thoml (See profile) - January 16, 2007 6:58 PM PST
0 out of 10 users found this comment helpful

January 2007 archive

S M Tu W Th F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

for Alpha.CNET.com

1x1
 

advertisement

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | Wii | GPS | Recipes | Mock Draft


© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use